Silverfort sells you a platform.
Authnull closes the gap by Friday.
Same gap, two very different purchases - one is an enterprise programme, the other is a line item you switch on. Here is the whole comparison in one frame.
Five places a focused layer beats a platform - pick one and see the difference.
Every database connection challenged and logged - not just the domain login.
Auditors ask who touched production data, and an identity-protocol tool cannot answer that. Authnull sits in front of MySQL and PostgreSQL as a proxy: a factor on connect, live masking on sensitive columns, and a full query trail - inside the same flat price as your AD enforcement.
A complete, dimension-by-dimension comparison.
A capability-by-capability breakdown across architecture, coverage, product category, and positioning - fourteen dimensions in total, including where Silverfort leads.
Authnull leads on 11 of 14 dimensions and ties on 1. The remaining 2 - cloud/SaaS breadth and ITDR - are areas where Silverfort leads.
Get this as a scorecardThe gap costs the same to close either way. The buying doesn't.
A platform purchase carries everything around the product: the cycle, the quote, the rollout, the training, the owners. None of that makes the auditor's finding go away faster. Here's what you skip.
Compare the real costProve it on the finding. Keep what works. Drop the platform bill if you want to.
Point Authnull at the exact paths the auditor flagged - AD logon, RADIUS, RDP, databases. Free tier, no procurement.
Move the enforcement paths onto flat pricing and shrink the platform to what only it can do. No rip-and-replace.
If Authnull covered the gap, renewal is an easy conversation. If you truly need ITDR depth, keep it - we'll tell you straight.